Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Perry89

Traps mechanics changing.

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Mako said:

There is no need to get personal, as I’ve already said in here. If you have nothing to add but insulting someone else, don’t post. 

How is that personal and not stated opinion? He clearly has zero context or evidence of the claim outside of "I gotta hunch just believe me."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's rude and dismissive, because of the phrasing chosen an the assumption that he must be making it up.

PP has a semi-public CID process, just like many other companies, so it's entirely possible for someone to know something they can't say. Same as for season 4 guild ball.

If you don't believe him, that's fine. but telling someone they're talking out of their ass simply because you don't believe them is not fine.

 

As I've already had to remind people not to get personal, this thread will be strictly monitored for people's behaviour.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Mako said:

It's rude and dismissive, because of the phrasing chosen an the assumption that he must be making it up.

Have they provided any reason to make us think they're not making it up? But I have derailed enough of this thread.

 

I do hope that if Jaecar loses hit pitfall trap, that some utility can come from the pitfall model. Worst case I can use it as a terrain piece.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Anudem said:

Have they provided any reason to make us think they're not making it up? But I have derailed enough of this thread.

 

I do hope that if Jaecar loses hit pitfall trap, that some utility can come from the pitfall model. Worst case I can use it as a terrain piece.

Burrow marker so oHearne can have 2 teleports and can really be one with Mother Earth. :D 
 

Or yeah, terrain piece... so when your opponent asks you: "Obstruction?" at the start of the game, you can yell "IT'S A TRAP!". 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, GeroJr said:

Burrow marker so oHearne can have 2 teleports and can really be one with Mother Earth. :D 
 

Or yeah, terrain piece... so when your opponent asks you: "Obstruction?" at the start of the game, you can yell "IT'S A TRAP!". 

I'm just waiting for SFG to make a Meme Guild.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a Guild Ball newbie. I've already spent money on Guild Ball, and I have been stewing over what to buy and where to complete my Hunters' Guild roster. But then I came across the new trap rules, and I was taken aback. I'll explain why, despite the fact that I'm sure it's too late and will fall on deaf ears, and in light of what seems to be a majority view that the new trap rules are a good thing. Please bear with me with regards to my verbosity (precision over concision), and if I make any mistakes in my references to rules or characters. :)

Without further ado, why I think it's a very negative change, and some rebuttal to why people think the changes are positive:

1. Even worse value for money, and making anything obsolete is bad.

The old Blessed Of The Sun Father box is hardly cheap or great value. Now, apart from the player cards all being obsolete, Jaecar's trap model is now obsolete. "Just use any old 30mm base or  piece of cardboard" is the gist of many replies. Well, honestly, I could just cut out a 30mm pieces of cardboard and write "Chaska" on it and, voila, I now have Chaska in my roster. I don't have Seenah yet. Just give me 30 seconds to cut one out.... 

I bought the set partly because of the trap being an actual, sculpted figure. Tabletop gaming (especially when we're paying the price of half a dozen good PC games for half a dozen little pieces of metal or plastic) is, for many of us, about the figures, and the artwork, and the painting, and presenting our army/guild/team with pride. So, honestly, the suggestion of using a generic substitute and accepting the obsolescence of Jaecar's trap seems rather a feeble 'solution'. We pay good money for quality products, and when part of our product is made obsolete, 'Just use <insert crummy, generic alternative>' doesn't help, really.


2. Traps are now generic.

In a game that's all about a handful of team members who all feel deeply individual and carefully crafted, Veteran Minx's Jawbone Trap, Jaecar's Pitfall Trap, and Chaska's Big Game Trap, are now all the same generic thing. Rather than serving slightly different functions, and Jaecar having the uniquely larger (but single) trap, all three characters use a generic trait to create generic traps.

Many have argued that it's a net buff to traps. That's debateable. Jaecar's trap, with its zero damage but Snared/Bleed condition combo, was a no-brainer to use Rest and remove both conditions. Now it's better to be forced to suffer either 1 DMG or Snared, some argue. But in the process, Jaecar's unique ability to apply Bleed was removed, and he's now a more generic character. Minx's traps are arguably better now. But the very fact that she had pure-damage traps, fitting with her savage, psycho, 'Why snare them when you can maim them?' theme, made her quite distinct and unique among the Hunters. Now; generic traps for a slightly more generic character.


3. Traps are now limited to 5, but not character-limited?

So Jaecar can now lay down a free trap every turn for 5 straight turns, but the moment he places his 5th trap, Chaska over on the other side of the map can't lay his own traps? This is an arbitrary game mechanic taking over from a thematic character-based and model-based mechanic. Jaecar couldn't place another Pitfall Trap before because he only had one. Chaska couldn't place a 4th Big Game trap before because he only had 3. Before, if I wanted to focus on traps, I could take 3 Hunters and reach 7 traps. Now, I can take 1 Hunter and reach 5 traps. Or 2 or 3 Hunters and still only reach 5 traps, because for some reason they must share a pool.

I understand game design and game balance quite well, and there are a dozen ways the number of traps (or simply the rules that determine their placement and implact on the field) could be balanced without imposing an arbitrary team limit. Before, we were limited to 1, 3, 4, 6, or 7 traps, depending on our team roster. It was a roster-building, thematic choice. Now it's an arbitrary limit of 5 generic traps, regardless.


4. Snare overload.

Snare is great, but the Hunters already had a bunch of ways to throw Snare on somebody. Since Snare doesn't stack, once an opponent is Snared they're only copping a measly 1 DMG to set off each subsequent generic trap. More Snare may be powerful, but powerful doesn't mean it's more fun or interesting, and it feels a tiny bit like a one-trick pony now. I don't think there's a problem because traps are weaker now, or because Snare is a bad thing, but because they're generic and boringly identical. And where before different opposing players might be more or less concerned about avoiding different traps (not to mention Jaecar's trap holding a larger physical presence on the field), now a trap is a trap is a trap, and once you're snared, a trap is a generic 1 DMG to soak or go around.


5. The 'streamlined' and 'simplified' generic trap is more newbie-friendly.

In a game with weird terminology, weird symbols in Playbooks, hyper-specific phrases, tokens and counters all over the place, numerous resources, three different types of plays, and a bunch of subtly tweaked and worded (and often conditional) traits and plays that make each guild a whole different beast from the others, I don't think a grand total of 3 types of traps being boiled down to 1 generic trap type is going to help new players much. If they can handle all over the information overload of Guild Ball, but can't work out that 40mm pitfall-style trap placed by Jaecar is his Pitfall Trap, and 30mm bear-trap-style trap placed by Chaska is his Big Game Trap, something's wrong.

If "Which trap is that, again?" and a quick look at the relevant charcter card is too hard for such a player to deal with, making traps generic isn't going to help them much. I mean, really, let's be honest about that. Dumbed down, simple, and generic is not what Guild Ball is about, so simplifying/streamlining/dumbing down one element of one guild is going to have next to no impact on the steepness of the game's learning curve.

 

 

In summary, I know the sky is not falling. It's not the end of the world for the Hunters' Guild. But it's also not as simple as, 'But they're better now, so it's sunshine and lollipops,' either.
What they've gained:
1. Simplified trap rules.
2. More snare and (arguably) an overall improvement to the effectiveness of traps.

What they've lost:
1. The original trap (and for many of us our only trap figure) is now obsolete.
2. Jaecar's ability to cause Bleed (and for a player without Seenah, the only source of Bleed).
3. The uniqueness of each character's individual traps (and therefore part of those characters' uniqueness).
4. Different trap area-denial potential for different team compositions (now 0 traps or 5 traps, Vs 1, 3,4, 6, or 7 before)
5. Options for choice and optimisation of when and how to prioritise Snare, Bleed, and DMG with traps Vs with character Traits/Plays.


By all means, please disagree with me. Please try to persuade me and convince me I'm wrong. But please don't trivialise the negative impact the changes have had (for some of us) on the Hunters' Guild with dismissive 'solutions' that don't address the real issue, or tell us how they're more powerful now (if being more powerful was the only issue, there would be no cause for complaint).

I'd also like to make it abundantly clear that I've been on both sides of these kinds of debates over the years. I've been a staunch advocate and defender of overhauls, streamlining, etc in some games, but I've also been vehemently against it for other games. Each and every time it's the spirit and essence of the game, what's fun, and what's balanced that has informed by viewpoints. So I'm not one of those grumps who resists change. I just resist change away from what makes something good in the first place. Personally I would prefer to keep traps as they were, but do away with the place-trap-then-push-them-into-it-in-the-same-activation option, to focus and balance around area denial and team plays. I'm sure many veterans would hate that idea, as it would remove one of their favourite Jaecar plays. But such a change would, I think, be in the spirit of what the Hunters' Guild traps should be all about.

Rant over. Bring on the agreement, disagreement, or crickets....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your post brought to life the idea of a new person getting into the game and only picking up the Sun Father box and only having a trap marker that is useless would be a bummer. Myself having Chaska and vMinx was blind to this fact.

The Farmers have harvest markers that are just cardboard punch outs and are all the same. You can look at it as the Hunters have 3 planter models now (our plants just lowers your defense and bite) and it aligns with the other marker laying guild in single rule and generic markers.

I also feel as you are underselling how good snare is as a condition. -1 DEF quickly turns into -2 DEF with a followup KD. Add in Isolated Target and very powerful character plays and models just melt or become all but ineffective.

There is still room to have cleaver placement with traps. Unavoidable 9 dmg Boombox is a thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm interested on how they'll rework the resin boxes coming out soon. Will each box get 5 trap markers? Thats the only way I see it as being fair. I'll probably work Jaecar's trap into a piece of terrain or Goal now.

As far as the way they've changed, I like the change. Having vMinx run up and drop a few traps to set up a Chaska Boom or a Seenah mauling has been a lot of fun. It still does damage giving vMinx her DEF buff. And while the snare can start to get repetitive and feel useless, having your opponents entire team snared feels so "Hunter". You want snare coming from everywhere. Need to slow down a goal scoring team, no problem. Need to reduce DEF on a high DEF team, no problem. Need your opponent to waste momentum clearing conditions just to keep up, no problem! With a team a bit more vulnerable to the counter attack game it helps us win the momentum game at the end of each round. Have you had a double activation with Seenah yet? Especially if the opponent puts a full stack into her but couldn't get those last 2 health boxes and then watched their world crumble before them. Its glorious

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obsolete sBrisket unless I get into church now obsolete trap marker.
Whats there stopping anyone from making a whole guild obsolete for whatever reason?

I wish we had variety in traps, I wish I could still play sBrisket in union.

And even if I bent and surrendered and bought Pride... oh hang on, I can't buy him unless I get whole box!
And with feebay nowadays charging like 30% of selling value "sell on ebay" is no longer a valid argument (in fact it never was)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the great, constructive comments, guys. I'm trying to come to grips with the changes and accept them, despite my strong dislike for them.

ultimogringo, I really do get that Snare is great (to quote myself: "Snare is great"). But I think with too much Snare available the trade-off and tough team roster decisions are missing. Veteran Minx missing that trade-mark Snare was a tactical trade-off. She was a bit of an oddball, but now she's just one of the Hunters' Guild gang, throwing out Snare. I really don't care about power; I care about choices, trade-offs, balance, fun, and thematic consistency. And yes, we can still have clever placement of traps, but with the which-trap variable thrown out, now the only variable is where.

BigThumbToe, I think you've probably captured my fears right there: "And while the snare can start to get repetitive and feel useless, having your opponents entire team snared feels so 'Hunter'. " Yes, it's thematic, but it's also now a bit more of a one-trick pony I think. There's a fine line between it 'being their thing' and being a common tactic, and just being 'their one thing' and becoming de rigueur.

Larhendiel, am I misssing something here? They haven't actually removed Seasoned Brisket from the Union entirely, have they? I mean, it's bad enough in a sense that, say, another guild might steal Veteran Chaska from the Hunters' Guild, and the poor old Hunters' Guild would be stuck only being able to field the original. But they haven't set the precendet for actually stripping characters we've bought in good faith from the Guilds they were originally shipped with, have they?

I hope you're mistaken, because that's a ghastly anti-consumer move if you're right.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Benesato said:

Larhendiel, am I misssing something here? They haven't actually removed Seasoned Brisket from the Union entirely, have they? I mean, it's bad enough in a sense that, say, another guild might steal Veteran Chaska from the Hunters' Guild, and the poor old Hunters' Guild would be stuck only being able to field the original. But they haven't set the precendet for actually stripping characters we've bought in good faith from the Guilds they were originally shipped with, have they?

I hope you're mistaken, because that's a ghastly anti-consumer move if you're right.

 

Yep. You can no longer use Seasoned Brisket in the Union. I get it. They want to make things even between the Union and other guilds. But it's still not the best customer friendly move. 

Same with Seasoned Spigot and Vet Fangtooth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Same thing they've done with all Union cross over models once the Major gets their Minor tho.

8/15 Possible players can lay out Snare. If you count the mascots because Falconers have a mascot that lays out snare.

3 of those 8 only do it with Traps. Of the remaining 5 are both Captains,  both Hearnes, and Zarola. Which limits selection a bit since you take only 1 Captain and 1 Hearne at a time. So while yes you could build a Snare list and make it a one trick pony, it seems unlikely anyone would. Its as common as any other guilds "thing". Wasn't snare introduced into the game with Hunters? Like Disease was with Rat Catchers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a few thoughts that came to me... all are a bit disjointed rather than a single topic or point.


The idea of putting 5 traps out with a single model is unrealistic. Even if your game gets to round 5, the earlier traps would likely be triggered if you placed them properly.

They have been honest from the get-go that the Order models were intended for a minor guild and not the Union. They allowed the models to be played with the Union until the minor guild was officially released. Saying that removing them now is not in good faith is ignoring the fact that it was announced already.

Yes simplifying traps by itself doesn't make the game easier for new players. However, it does stack with the other changes made across the board to simplify the game. It likely doesn't make that much of an impact, especially for one of the more complicated guilds (Hunters) but the developers are looking at it from a larger context.

The game belongs to SFG, so yes, they can decide any model, card, or entire guild is obsolete at any time and there's very little a player can do other than agree with their friends to play an earlier version of the game. That is true for GW, FFG, WK, CB, and other companies that have done that very thing.
Whether or not that is ultimately good for the company, the players, the game in general, or none of the above is usually better seen in hindsight. 

Personally, I liked the diversity in traps, but the change is such a small impact to the game and the guild that I wouldn't have focused on it.... Jaecar is worth talking about outside of his trap change, though, as he went from a must take to a first dropped model for many players.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have yet to play Jaecar in S4 and traps have nothing to do with that. Other than the trap being larger I found it rarely impacted things in a huge way. Had they given him Crucial Artery or a way to gain it things would be much different. I would of liked a character play like "Sharpen Blades"- This model gains Crucial Artery." Or like vMinx, a way to drop multiple traps a turn. I think either one of those would have him competing for the line up again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BigThumbToe said:

I have yet to play Jaecar in S4 and traps have nothing to do with that. Other than the trap being larger I found it rarely impacted things in a huge way. Had they given him Crucial Artery or a way to gain it things would be much different. I would of liked a character play like "Sharpen Blades"- This model gains Crucial Artery." Or like vMinx, a way to drop multiple traps a turn. I think either one of those would have him competing for the line up again

Or an aura. Traps triggered with 1inch of this model also cause the bleed condition. . .

The traps are all the same but Jaecar he can use them differently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"They have been honest from the get-go that the Order models were intended for a minor guild and not the Union. They allowed the models to be played with the Union until the minor guild was officially released."

Fair enough, for anybody who's been with Steamforged for a long time now. But for a new player coming along who wants to buy some figures and get into the game, they may buy "in good faith" (I didn't say removing them was not in good faith, but talked about buying them in good faith; a subtle but important difference) figures that very clearly have the Union card with them, and reasonably believe that the figure is therefore, of course, a valid Union figure. That's consistent with, well, pretty much every other game developer's practice forever. It's anti-consumer to have fine print, asterisks, and "Didn't ya know?" policies.

From a game consumer's point of view, certain things are givens, such as a character's team affiliation being inviolable. I think it's fair to assert that it's a major unspoken rule of tabletop gaming, so to break it is unwise, and is going to be a negative, anti-consumer experience for new players. Dual-affiliation would have solved all of these problems. For a game that's already a bit of a nightmare for a new consumer to handle (sets sold out, on indefinite pre-order status, 3-player starter sets, blisters and bags with singles, different models, metals, plastics, and resins, boxes with widly different presentation, different versions of the same character on different guilds, and prices that vary wildly from seller to seller for no apparent reason) the added question of whether the figures they want to buy are actually still valid for the guild the figure clearly belongs to on the packaging is a very poor, anti-consumer business choice I think.

I'd love to see Guild Ball grow and thrive, but it's in a really fractured state right now for a consumer. Perhaps less so where some of you live (here in Australia, and as an online customer, it's very patchy). I realise many of the problems for consumers are due to the teething problems Steamforged is having in this brave new world of games and miniature production. But they can't afford to pass on too many of their teething problems to the consumer if they want to succeed in the long term. Perhaps they just don't have the luxury of distance, objectivity, and a new consumer's perspective, but if they did I think they'd seriously look at addressing the issue and creating a clearer roadmap so that consumers, new and old, know the current state of the game and where things are going.

A good start would be to update that Guild Ball Wiki on Fandom! I know it's not their official site or anything, but many of us (particularly Warframe players) search for a game's Wiki when we first start to research it. That's where I first started looking into individual characters and their cards and abilities, and it wasn't until very recently that I even found out that almost every card was entirely obsolete and wrong.

As for Jaecar's changes, it does look a bit like a pendulum swing. Did they really have to strip him of both his Bleed abilities? Oh, right; The Hunters do Snare, Snare, and more Snare. One Bleed and one Poison is all they get!

By now I'm sure you may have noticed that I'm a person who picks very specific things apart in fine detail. Overall I think Guild Ball is a fantastic game that is a bit too expensive to draw many new players in (but the cheap Kick Off! seems to have been a tremendously effective way to bring new players into the fold on a budget, and a brilliant move by Steamforged), in a messy, tumultuous place for consumers with their patchy pricing and availability, and therefore in desperate need of some stability, good PR, and a clear roadmap of the future of their game and product releases to ensure its long-term success. Being an old-school gamer, but a very new Guild Ball player with a keen eye for the consumer experience, I figure I can offer a bit of a unique perspective. But, for the record, I have already spent a chunk of money on their overpriced, silly little Hunters' Guild dollies. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Benesato said:

(I didn't say removing them was not in good faith, but talked about buying them in good faith; a subtle but important difference)

I don't disagree with most of your points. I do think 'anti-consumer' sounds a bit harsh, though... just the implied tone of the word. Your post goes on to explain your views, though, which I generally agree with. Here in Canada distribution and availability can be a bit difficult as well... not so bad online depending on the shipping costs. 

In the case of the Order, I think the devs' choice had to do with keeping people interested in new products and doing something for established players, knowing there'd be some growing pains when they finally moved them to their own guild.... I've been a bit surprised, to be honest, that I have had to explain that to some Union/Order players, even though I don't play the team. I do, however, tend to research pretty much everything. :)

It would probably pay them to bring a fan/pundit volunteer into their inner circle and give them some perks to update the wiki. It seems that's what Corvus Belli has done for Infinity.

Also, for the record, I can think of times when GW, FFG, and Corvus Belli all did things much worse than moving a few models over to another team. GW has shut down entire games, like Warhammer Fantasy and War of the Ring, sometimes replacing them with less developed product. As well, GW and CB have made entire factions obsolete, and recently CB moved all their Japanese models off their Asian faction and into independence. That last move did confuse some newer players who bought the older Japanese starter expecting to be able to use it with the newer Asian pack that came out. FFG just invalidated an entire history of X-Wing models and cards, unless you want to spend hundreds of dollars 'upgrading' them to 2nd edition.
So... just saying that things that seem inviolable to a player may not seem quite so to the game company.

I would have been happy if they gave Jaecar Crucial Artery, or the trap aura mentioned by ultimogringo, although a character play enabling him to give Crucial Artery to himself or a teammate would have been interesting. ("It's dangerous to go alone... here take this.")

I'm really hoping they realize that for several teams they didn't just give us options and make lesser used figures more viable, but they also made some previously used models the first players to be dropped from lists. That's not, I don't think, the balance they were looking for. 

The changes to Brick, for instance, that's reasonable. He's still a pain for anyone who doesn't have unpredictable movement. Teamed with the ape, they can still protect a lot of ground. Changes to Jac, Jaecar, and others seem to have left them on the side lines. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, mbdeyes said:

I don't disagree with most of your points. I do think 'anti-consumer' sounds a bit harsh, though... just the implied tone of the word.

A very fair point. I guess I didn't consider that my 'Bad for the consumer' sense is only one end of the spectrum for an expression that goes right up to 'Completely against the consumer'. Guild Ball's problems are bad for the consumer is the sense I meant, as you clearly worked out in the end. My bad. :)

 

13 hours ago, mbdeyes said:

So... just saying that things that seem inviolable to a player may not seem quite so to the game company.

Yikes. I guess my time away from tabletop gaming has seen a few darker changes than I realised. It sounds like I've lost touch with the tabletop games industry on my hiatus. I guess that should probably come as no surprise when, alongside it, PC gaming has collectively dumped proper key-binding customisation, and pushed power creep, day-one DLCs, pay-to-win, lootboxes, and pre-order exclusives down our throats.

13 hours ago, mbdeyes said:

I'm really hoping they realize that for several teams they didn't just give us options and make lesser used figures more viable, but they also made some previously used models the first players to be dropped from lists. That's not, I don't think, the balance they were looking for. 

I hope not. I really, really hope they naively took away a chunk of Jaecar's uniqueness and value, rather than cynically stripping away his Bleed to make Mataagi more appealing to drive Hunters players to buy the Falconers. That's kind of common practice for products of all kinds (games of any kind in particular). The optimistic part of me hopes that the cynical part of me is wrong about this. :)

Thanks for the feedback. Always good to know when and where I'm failing to communicate clearly.

 

As for Jaecar, the mention of having a trap-altering aura got me thinking about how cool (and, with regards to rules and game complexity, pretty simple) it would be if players could enhance a trap with an ability. What if some Hunter characters could have Plays something like:

Jaecar:

Whittle Barbs (CST1) (RNG 1") (SUS ) (OPT )

Target single friendly trap within range is enhanced with bleed. When triggered, the trap's target suffers the bleed condition in addition to its normal trap effects.

[Place a bleed token on the trap to indicate it is enhanced]

Egret:

Apply Poison (CST1) (RNG 1") (SUS ) (OPT )

Target single friendly trap within range is enhanced with poison. When triggered, the trap's target suffers the poison condition in addition to its normal trap effects.

[Place a poison token on the trap to indicate it is enhanced]

Ulfr:

Added Blades (CST1) (RNG 1") (SUS ) (OPT )

Target single friendly trap within range is enhanced with 1 DMG. When triggered, the trap's target suffers 1 DMG in addition to its normal trap effects.

[Place a Blades token on the trap to indicate it is enhanced. Only one Blades token may be placed on any trap]

 

Egret's card is getting a bit full, but Jaecar and Ulfr could certainly fit these on.

Balance-wise, is it worth spending an extra INF (and, if not the original layer of the trap, moving over near it) to enhance the trap, knowing that the enemy is that much more likely to just avoid it? A trap with both bleed and poison would be nasty, but then they're just conditions, so with 3 conditions it would be a no-brainer to just use Rest. And, since it would require multiple activations, it's not like the Hunters pull the old Jaecar create-trap-then-push-into-straight-away trick with an uber-enhanced trap.  Fairly often the extra INF would be better spent doing something else, so balance-wise I really don't see it being too big a deal, but it would restore some of the uniqueness of trap/character interactions, and it would shut up players like me! :)

Any other ideas out there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Benesato said:

I really, really hope they naively took away a chunk of Jaecar's uniqueness and value, rather than cynically stripping away his Bleed to make Mataagi more appealing to drive Hunters players to buy the Falconers. That's kind of common practice for products of all kinds (games of any kind in particular). The optimistic part of me hopes that the cynical part of me is wrong about this. :)

Some great points, and I love the idea of enhancing traps.

As for the above point, based on all the general interviews I heard with the different S4 team change reveals, I would say it's somewhere in between those two things. This view, of course, gives the devs the benefit of the doubt and takes what they said at face value. It's still easy to be cynical, assuming they just want to sell us new models.

That being said, I don't think it was primarily to drive sales of one model over another. I think they genuinely looked at game balance and saw who in S3 was being automatically taken by players vs who was never being taken. Their aim was to get as close to balance as possible where what figure  was taken was based on a player's preference or playstyle rather than the tactical viability of the figure. They believe that is what is best for the players, the game, as well as sales.... I think there are several examples where they overshot their mark, though. Jaecar, as an example, was an auto-take in S3 for most Hunter teams. Dropping him down a notch, or bringing other figures up to his level would have been reasonable. However, they went a little too far. I don't think he's completely unusable, but many players are saying they simply won't bother with him in S4 (same for Jac).

Anyway... enough derailing by me... back to trap mechanics!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, ultimogringo said:

Make them playbook results only like More Teeth and I can be talked into this. 

"Have at thee. Take this. Take that! Now, good sir, please refrain from retaliatory impulses momentarily as I whittle barbs into the business end of this here man-trap I have set for thee."

As a preparatory measure, I think the idea is sound. But as a mid-battle Playbook result, it doesn't feel right to me. I can stretch my imagination juuuust enough to accept Veteran Minx throwing down a pre-set trap mid battle in some Hollywood-esque move. I can stretch my imagination a bit less to imagine Egret, in the distraction of the battle between Minx and her for, quickly applying some of her arrows' poison to the trap while not directly engaged herself. But I can't stretch my imagination far enough to see any character quickly enhancing a trap between blows.

That's also why I'd personally (as I mentioned earlier) be in favour of a change preventing traps from being laid out and triggered as part of battle. Placing a trap and pushing somebody into it in the same activation just seems a bit wrong to me. A long-term setup rather than a clunky mid-battle bonus of Snare/damage seems more fitting and interesting to me. Enhancing principally out of battle rather than exclusively part of Playbook battle results seems like a good way to push that theme a little without the need to overhaul the existing trap placement mechanics.

Thanks again for the discussion. I'm glad I took the gamble and risked finally returning to a game forum (I've avoided them for over a decade, as typically forums for games are more toxic than Compound's arm-pits!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/6/2018 at 1:00 PM, BigThumbToe said:

I'm interested on how they'll rework the resin boxes coming out soon. Will each box get 5 trap markers? Thats the only way I see it as being fair. I'll probably work Jaecar's trap into a piece of terrain or Goal now.

 

Curious about this as well, the pics in the webstore still show a single 40mm trap, and 3 traps for Chaska in the other box. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×