Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Desertspiral

  • Rank
    Seasoned Veteran

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    The deep wilderness of Australia

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Cheers for the lively discourse everyone; and the tesult is what what I expected so thanks :).
  2. Does an ‘S’ character play triggered off book proc resilience? thanks
  3. Desertspiral

    How do you deal with tilt?

    It's all about mindset. Also, the grass is greener to an extent, all the match ups you mentioned are probably thinking - if thresher gets a clean line on me i'm done. The best way to avoid being tilted is to laugh; just enjoy the moment like Gorion said and realise that whatever else it's not sheep stations.
  4. How much Colonial content is there? Since that's the best metric for listening to any pod cast 😛
  5. Desertspiral

    Veteran Decimate

    Maybe not the right place, and I'm really interested - why Pinpot, I don't have him as my brewers collection started just before the switch to six man boxes and he became unavailable. I don't exactly see the point? Granted the burst influence efficiency seems good on paper and yet if that's all he does then I'm not sure if he's worth hunting down? So if folks could give a solid overview of how he makes it into a team and then further how he positively impacts the game that would be grand!
  6. Desertspiral

    Tapper - why ever bring him???

    I've been doing some more thinking about this problem; and have been toying around with the following idea. Why not just take Quaff with Tapper? Logically from what this thread has generate Tapper is there as a support and set up piece to generate CA, and knock downs rather than take outs and to do that he only really needs four influence so the (+0/+1) is a nice to have rather than a necessity. Secondly since Brewers typically have short play books yes, and also trend to suffer from low Tac something that is helped by CA, and also crowds - however, Bag of quaffers also helps this by increasing the wrap potential. As Brewers don't tend to do momentous damage until the last two columns it also helps to ensure that you reach those momentous results - particularly against the tougher teams. On top of Quaffers players are basically conditioned to never trigger Loved creature so you can keep Quaff in the scrum and use him as a crowd or for the m>> results to help you get a favourable scrum. If they do trigger it though you have a board wide boost to your team so it's win/win. Lastly and perhaps most importantly second wind is an amazing play and given that it lets your primary damage dealer go in and then retreat unscathed you are able to set up a very strong yoyo that can just delete a player and then back out to safety or go deeper if its late in the turn to reach for the next line. All the logic behind Old jakes giving you a flexible game plan support this as well wince Quaff can then become a dynamic piece who allows other members of the team to reach further and/or just perform better. I appreciate that there is a lot of love for scum and the fact that he's basically the only brewer with M.Damage on 2 columns (outside of Lucky), however, does Quaff provide a valid and useful alternative that outshines the simplicity of pure damage? Thanks
  7. Desertspiral

    Tapper - why ever bring him???

    I don't understand how Brewers are supposed to outscrum a team that has a good portion of reach, and mostly all have two armour as well (whether natively or through proximity). Lets (for arguments sake) say the team is: Ferrite (C), Hearth, Furnace, Iron, Cinder, and Alloy. It's faster than Brewers, handles better, and hits harder as well as being way tougher. Also every scrum is instantly lost the moment Ferrite activates and disarms 2-3 people, not to mention furnace dropping CoaaT for free and eliminating any potential strength in numbers. At that point brewers have nothing. For reference I was using Tapper, Scum, Friday, Spigot, Hooper and Lucky. I feel like saying just take out the apprentices, may as well be saying get gud and just win. It doesn't really appreciate the holistic board state and the fact that smiths synergise way better than brewers do, and a lot more of it is passive. Brewers have to work really hard to make progress on take outs vs Smiths and since smiths have a lot of effective low momentous results its easier for them to undo the headway and make stymie any further progress. Again though - I'm open to any input that explains in a logical way how Brewers out perform in this scenario. Cheers
  8. Desertspiral

    Tapper - why ever bring him???

    I've been fielding Tapper a lot and had two games this week with him, firstly into Hunters and secondly into Blacksmiths. Perhaps I'm using him incredibly wrong; in the Hunters game I felt completely shut out and probably made some positioning errors. Having scored a goal with Friday though I had Jaecar and ranged attacks murder two players and then I was in no position to even engage after that. I don't see how a 9" threat range 'out threats' anything. Against smiths - I took the feedback from this thread and in spite of my skepticism sent the team as a tight ball into the field. I was able to get an early take out on Cinder, and then from there got completely wrecked in a scrum. This is probably a meta problem rather than a 'Tapper' problem (except that Tapper is very emblematic of the issue) and I feel like smiths out dps, out sustain and out score brewers all at the same time - which is exceptionally frustrating. It's possible that Brewers just aren't a good play style fit except that that seems like a cop out - so I'd rather figure out what they need to do in order to chalk up consistent victory. From what I've seen so far though - being tough is not a win condition and the newer teams out perform Brewers by a far margin. So what are the Brewer players doing to actually rack up wins (particularly with Tapper as Esters has a solid range denial game that doesn't expose her in the way that Tapper needs to be). All thoughts welcome
  9. Desertspiral

    Tapper - why ever bring him???

    Ok so the Fish/Union player pivot off your early engage and then use gutter to lynch the rest of your team - followed up by additional rage attacks or protected by dread gaze respectively. How do Brewers then handle those two scenarios ?
  10. Desertspiral

    Tapper - why ever bring him???

    What's your general strategy vs. Vet Rage? How are you out fighting him? Also what do you do into Corsair+Gutter?
  11. Desertspiral

    Tapper - why ever bring him???

    Hey that was great thanks, especially as I am looking for evidence to support the use of Tapper and where he excels rather than a comparison of the two Brewer captains.
  12. Desertspiral

    Tapper - why ever bring him???

    Ok so Let's agree that we've all read the card... I'm curious what you mean by influence efficiency though as it seems like he needs to spend three to achieve anything, once CA is up he is also swinging in the breeze with his very mediocre def stats and seems like he's more on farm status than anything? It might be just me and his playbook in a 2018 environment seems entirely underwhelming especially when viewed side by side with newer captains (particularly Grange who seems to eclipse him in every way). Having to hit four successes for momentous damage seems like a lost cause - especially when he's your alpha strike and to get any meaningful work done he needs to wrap off the charge which is very unreliable. I understand the argument that he isn't there to deliver a knock out, but to set up the scrum - which again seems flawed as the model he engaged on then has a chance to react and/or if the opponent has any ranged potential - just leave him there and focus other areas of the pitch. Jakes is great, and if he's just pushed deep to deploy 'his package' then is he in a position to use old jakes effectively, as it seems that if everyone is that close to the opposing line then something has gone wrong given Brewers tend to be slow and have troubles initiating? I also feel it's a long bow to draw in saying that Old Jakes trumps the boos that some legendaries provide. It's possible that I just don't understand how the game plan of dangling Tapper in the breeze ends in a victory against anyone that refuses to collapse on him - or maybe it explains the poor performance of Brewers in general? Possibly a holistic break down of the game plan would give me better insight as to why he would even make the ten let alone the A string. Thanks for expanding on those ideas
  13. Desertspiral

    Tapper - why ever bring him???

    Ok, thanks for that and tying this back to my initial query - what does Tapper bring that justifies putting him on the pitch. In most cases he presents as a liability more than an asset and the things that he brings appear to be of limited value given the proximal restrictions on them. So what is the logic for bringing Tapper. Thanks
  14. Desertspiral

    Tapper - why ever bring him???

    Hi everyone, I know the title might sound provocative and it probably is considering the group think regarding Tapper > Esters. However, I've been playing Brewers for a bit now and I am honestly struggling to find a scenario (Any) that I would actually want Tapper in. So for all of the old guard in here; what is the purpose of bringing Tapper and at what point does he perform in a way that isn't just eclipsed by Ester' tool kit? Thanks
  15. Desertspiral

    Idea for Thresher Change

    Bushel is also a 3/8" - the other thing to really consider though is that for the family on Grange creates a lot of forgiveness with respect to passing etc. Sure he can barrel in and best case scenario he executes a squishy (top of 2 after winning initiative) then kicks a goal and knee slides back - however, if the stars don't align on that then he's really deep in the creek and has no back up to help him out.